Author Archive for Miko Peled

18
Sep
09

THEY LIKE TO CALL IT A WAR

By Miko Peled

48 hours after I landed the reality of this land, a land that people like to call holy, began taking its toll on me. The movie “Boy In Stripped Pajamas” came to mind as I played with my kids in the pool of Kibbutz Zikkim, a beautiful pastoral little kibbutz or agricultural commune, is on the Mediterranean coast just a stone’s throw from Gaza to the north. The narrative in the movie describes the innocent German boy by the name of Bruno growing up across the fence from concentration camp. The German boy whose father is the commander of the camp is completely oblivious to the reality beyond the fence and is forbidden by his mother from exploring the backyard. But while Bruno’s mother naïvely believes the “farm” to be an internment camp, her husband has sworn under oath never to reveal that it is in fact an extermination camp specifically designed to help the Nazis achieve their horrific “Final Solution.” Eventually defying his mother’s rules and venturing out beyond the backyard, Bruno arrives at a barbed wire fence to find a young boy just his age emptying rubble from a wheel barrel. That boy, obviously a prisoner at the camp was wears a stripped pajama.

For israelis this narrative is a frightening one, but sadly they have plunged themselves into a reality where this narrative is being re played but with a new cast. This time Israelis are living across the fence from Gaza, but unlike the German family in the movie they are not oblivious to what goes on in the camp. For the most part Israelis are not only aware of the horrors that take place in the concentration camp near them, they see it as justified.

It’s only been about six months since my last visit here, just as Israel was preparing to launch its latest sadistic terror attack on the civilian population of Gaza, a population whose average age is 15.5, a population of innocent children. I visited Zikkim then because after all, it is the home of my in-laws, the place where my wife was born and raised.

In this chauvinistic state created by my forefathers the terror attack on Gaza is called a war. It is much easier that way for the consciences to bear. After all, fighting an enemy that possess tanks and war planes, artillery and sophisticated weapons, smart bombs and air to air missiles, along with anti aircraft and anti tank weapons is a great deal more heroic than to massacre innocent children, women and men who are defenseless, have no means of escape and no means of fighting back. But of course the reality is that the Israeli army, that sadistic military force that has made a name for itself over the last sixty years as a force to be reckoned with, is in fact no more than a shameless army of cowards lead by a junta of brutal, sadistic racists.

Instead of the patronizing call we constantly hear for a “Palestinian Gandhi” one would hope to see the emergence of international support for a Palestinian Patrick Henry. The call “Give me liberty or give me death” awakens strong emotions even today, more than 320 yeas after Patrick Henry gave the speech that crystallized perhaps more than any the American colonies call for independence from the English crown.

There has never been, not is it likely that an occupying power will ever relinquish its domination willingly. Israel is not different. Not only is Israel not likely to end its iron rule over Palestine and its people, it is placing all of its effort to make Greater Israel a permanent and irreversible reality. So while Patrick Henry’s was a call for arms, in the case of the Palestinian struggle the call should be for a more sophisticated and more effective national struggle.

There is nothing Israel likes better than a military confrontation, and the Israeli “security” forces go out of their way to blame Palestinian for initiating violence so as to justify their own brutality. But a violent struggle only helps the oppressor and it is in fact a statement of despair.

Three clear goals struggle on which the struggle would do well to focus could be as follows:

1. Granting all Palestinians full equal rights with Israelis.
2. Granting Palestinians unrestricted freedom of movement within Israel/Palestine.
3. Reigning in the Israeli forces and withdrawing them of from population centers.

Until these conditions are met, Palestinians have no reason to negotiate or cooperate with the Israeli authorities. Until they are met there needs to be a concerted effort to isolate Israel, and to initiate a struggle that defies its laws and undermines it authority. Israel profits greatly from Palestinians who are forced to apply and pay for permits and licenses; Israel profits from Palestinians who are forced to buy Israeli products. Haaretz newspaper recently reported on the huge profits that Israeli farmers and government agents make as a result of the siege imposed on Gaza. An effort can focus on the idea, also made famous during the American Revolution that there can be “no taxation without representation” calling for defiance of the Israeli authorities and boycott of Israeli products and goods.

Those who still believe in a negotiated settlement with Israel on the basis of two states should read the following lines from Patrick Henry’s famous speech: “It is natural for men to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth…Are we disposed to be of the number of those who having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not…”

In the long run, the best possible outcome for Israelis and Palestinians is a pluralistic democracy where people’s rights are protected by a constitution and the rule of law. Israelis and Palestinians, by virtue of their sharing a homeland are fellow countrymen. As such they are deserving of the same rights and share the same responsibilities. Their first responsibility is to engage in a struggle to bring an end to the apartheid regime that holds them both in a seemingly endless struggle, and to cooperate as equals for a better future.
Jerusalem, August, 2009.

13
Sep
09

Bil’in, The New Heroes of The Resistance.

I had visited Bil’in again this sumer, to participate in the weekly Friday protest.  After spending the night with a friend in Ramallah, we drove throught the beauttiful hilly roads that are typial of Palestine and arrived just in time for the march.

The people of Bil’in endure live ammunition, tear gas, arbitrary arrests, abuse of their children by Israeli forces. But their spirit is never broken. Mohammad Al Khatib was in jail when I was there, but his brother, dressed in waterproof overalls soiled by Israeli “stinky water” smiled at me and said: “It is only temporary”. With the support of the members of the Int’l Solidarity Movement, Israelis and others they go on, fighting for the peace and justice they and all of us deserve.

Here are some images from this place where giants dwell.

04
Aug
09

מותו של פתרון שתי המדינות מאת מיקו פלד

שליחו של הנשיא אובמה, הסנטור גורג מיטשל הודיע שוב שארה”ב עדייו רואה במפת הדרכים וברעיון שתי המדינות את הדרך לפטרון הסכסוך הישראלי-פלסטיני. הגיע העת לאמר לאמריקאים שאלו הם שני רעיונות שזמנם חלף וראוי שהממשל האמריקאי יכיר בכך ויתחיל לעסוק ברצינות ברעיון של החלת דמוקרטיה חילונית על כל שטחי ישראל-פלסטין.  זהו רעיון שאישים מתונים משני המחנות דגלו בו מתחילת דרכן של התנועות הלאומיות היהודית והפלסטינית, ואשר גורמים מיליטנטים הרואים במאבק בין שני העמים מלחמת אין קץ הורידו משולחן הדיונים.  ובכן, הגיע הזמן להשיב רעיון זה לשולחן הדיונים ויפה שעה אחת קודם.

על פי רעיון המדינה החילונית-דמוקרטית כל תושבי הארץ יהנו משויון זכויות וחובות מלאים ללא הבדלי דת או לאום. כל קבוצה תוכל לחיות ע”פ דתה ושפתה ומוסדות המדינה לא יהיו מזוהים עם קבוצה ספציפית אחת אך תפקידם יהיה להגן על זכויותיו של כל אזרח ואזרח.  ישום רעיון זה יאפשר לשני העמים לחיות סוף סוף בשלום ולהפסיק את שפיכות דמים.  זהו ללא ספק רעיון שאפתני שיעורר את זעמם של ציונים רבים ויקים התנגדות נחרצת אך בהתחשב במציאות הגאוגרפית והדמוגרפית אין פתרון אחר שיש בכוחו להביא לסיום משטר האפרטהייד השורר היום בישראל-פלסטין.

כהכנה ללחץ אמריקאי ממשלת נתניהו מתבצרת בעמדות מיליטנטיות קיצוניות ללא תקדים. יחד עם זאת, גודלה של ממשלת נתניהו וחוצפתה מבטיחות ששום מידה של לחץ אמריקאי לא יביא לשנוי בעמדת ישראל בנושא הפלסטיני.  שיכורים מדם לאחר שבצעו טבח המוני בעזה, כוחות ה”בטחון” של ישראל בניצוחו של רב המרצחים, הגנרל המעותר ביותר בתולדות ישראל – אהוד ברק, ממשיכים להרוג ילדים ואנשי שלום מובהקים, ממשיכים לאסור ולענות והעיקר לא מותרים על הזכות לרדות בעם הפלסטיני.  חשוב להזכיר שגם ההרג בעזה שהיה בקנה מידה אדיר, וגם החיסול הממוקד יותר של ילדים כעביר עראמין ז”ל ואנשי שלום כבסאם אבו רחמה ז”ל וטריסטן אנדרסון שעדיין נאבק על חייו, נעשים לאור יום ומתועדים היטב. בבוא היום לא תהיה שום בעיה להביא את האחראים בצבא ובממשלה לדין על חלקם בביצוע פשעים אלה.

הנשיא קרטר טוען שהאפרטהייד איננה קיימת בישראל כי אם בשטחים שנכבשו ב 1967.  אך כאן באה המציאות ומראה לנו תמונה שונה בתחלית: כמה שלא ננסה ונתעקש, אין מדינת ישראל מדינה דמוקרטית כי אם מדינת אפרטהייד.  ממשלת ישראל שולטת בחייהם של כעשרה מיליון בני אדם החיים בין הירדן לים התיכון – חצי מהם ישראלים וחצי פלסטינים.  בעוד שתושבי הארץ היהודים נהנים מחוקים דמוקרטיים התושבים המוסלמים והנוצרים, או במילים אחרות התושבים הפלסטינים חיים תחת חוקים שונים לחלוטין.  כמיליון וחצי פלסטינים בתוך ישראל  חיים כאזרחים עם זכויות מוגבלות המופלים לרעה וכשלושה מיליון וחצי פלסטינים בגדה ובעזה הם חסרי זכויות וחסרי הגנה לחלוטין.  את הגדה המערבית לא ניתן יותר להפריד משאר שטחי הארץ ואין שום אפשרות להקים בגדה או בשום אזור אחר, ישות מדינית עצמאית נוספת. כל הלחץ ותחנונים מצד אמריקה לא יוכלו לשנות מציאות זו המחייבת את שני העמים לחיות במדינה אחת.

כל הנסיונות להביא לסיום הסכסוך בישראל-פלסטין דרך הפרדה ובידוד נכשלו ומפת הדרכים ורעיון שתי המדינות אינם אלא שני כשלונות נוספים בשרשרת ארוכה של כשלונות כאובים.  כפי שמלמד הנסיון בארצות הברית, דרום אפריקה וארצות אחרות, רק שוויון זכויות מלא המעוגן בחוק (או בחוקה) יש בכוחו להביא לשקט ולשלום בין עמים אשר להם מולדת משותפת.  רעיון הדמוקרטיה החילונות איננו פשוט וההתנגדות לישומו תהיה קשה ותדרוש הקרבה.  יהיה צורך להמרות את חוקי הכיבוש ןלהיתמודד עם אלימות של חיילים וסוכני הכיבוש האחרים הפוחדים פחד מוות ממאבק צודק בלתי אלים.  כל זה נדון כעט בפורומים אקדמיים ופוליטים רבים, ויעשה טוב הממשל האמריקאי ויעשו טוב מנהיגים מקומיים, פלסטינים וישראלים כאחד אם יצטרפו לדיון ויקחו יוזמה.

04
Aug
09

השאלות השתנו

השאלות השתנו

מאת מיקו פלד

ישנו סיפור ידוע על אלברט איינשטיין שבו נותן הפרופסור המהולל מבחן לכיתה מסויימת למרות שכבר נתן את אותו המבחן לאותה הכיתה.  כשהבחין  בכך עוזרו של איינשטיין מיהר להזהירו שאותה הכיתה כבר ניבחנה על אותו החומר.  הפרופסור חייך ואמר: זה בסדר, התשובות השתנו. כך גם אצלנו, השאלות אותן השאלות אבל התשובות השתנו.

עד לפני כעשר שנים התשובה לשאלה כיצד ניתן להביא לשלום היתה ברורה: מדינה פלסטינאית עצמאית בגדה המערבית ובעזה בשכנות למדינת ישראל. אבל היום   התשובה של שתי מדינות לשני עמים שייכת למציאות שחלפה מן העולם. כיום לאחר למעלה מ- 40 שנות כיבוש, כאשר הגדה מחולקת ומבוטרת ומשוזרת בישובים ובכבישים המיועדים ליהודים בלבד, כאשר חומת הפרדה כולאת מליוני פלסטינאים בגטאות בגדה ובעזה, וכאשר ברור לכל שאין מנהיג בישראל שיש בכוחו להביא לחלוקת ארץ ישראל – התשובה שונה.

מה היא אם כן הֿתשובה לשאלה קשה זו? כיום חיים למעלה מ – 10 מיליון בני אדם בין הים והירדן, כ 5.5 מליון יהודים וקרוב ל- 4.5 מליון פלסטינים כשמדינת ישראל, מדינת היהודים שולטת בכל.  מצב הפלסטינים נע בין חיים כאזרחים דרגה ג בתוך ישראל לבין נתינים משוללי זכויות תחת משטר צבאי בשטחים הכבושים. ברור שמציאות זו לא תוכל להמשך לנצח.  במוקדם או במאוחר תדרש ישראל לתת זכויות שוות לפלסטינאים שחיים תחת שלטונה, השאלה היא אם זה יבוא כתוצאה משפיכות דמים או כתוצאה מתהליך מדיני.

שני ספרים חשובים המצביעים על תמורות חשובות ראויים לציון כאן.  הספר הראשון שזכה לתהודה רבה וכבר נמצא ברשימת רבי המכר של הניו יורק טיימז הוא ספרו של נשיא ארה”ב לשעבר וידיד ישראל גימי קרטר.  ספרו של הנשיא קרטר “Palestine, Peace Not Apartheid” פתח לראשונה בארה”ב את הדלת לדיון משמעותי בנושא הטרגדיה של העם הפלסטיני.  קרטר מתאר את המציאות בה חיים הפלסטינים תחת שלטון ישראל כאפרטייד.  שנשיא אמריקאי ישתמש במונח אפרטייד כדי לתאר את שלטון ישראל בשטחים – זוהי תמורה חשובה שאין דומה לה.  ואכן, מאז יצא הספר בארה”ב הדיון בו אינו פוסק ולא נראה שיפסק בזמן הקרוב.

הספר השני הוא ספרו של ההסטוריון הישראלי אילן פפה: “The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine”.  חשוב לתת את הדעת על שמוש במושג ethnic cleansing או  טיהור אתני כדי לתאר את הטרגדיה שעבר העם הפלסטיני בין השנים 1947-1949.  ספרו של פפה, מזעזע ככל שיהיה, מהוה הזדמנות ללמוד בפרטי פרטים על ההרס שנגרם לעם הפלסטיני בידי ישראל בתקופת מלחמת השחרור, מלחמה אשר בסיומה על חורבות פלסטין הוקמה מדינת ישראל .

מה שמסתמן מקריאת שני הספרים זה שספרו של קרטר הוא המשך של מה שמתאר אילן פפה. במילים אחרות, מדיניות מדינת ישראל לגבי הפלסטינים עכשיו מהווה המשך לטיהור האתני של 1948. ניתן אולי להתוכח על פרט זה או אחר הן בספרו של קרטר והן בספרו של פפה, אבל לא ניתן להתוכח על העובדות.  במהלך מלחמת העצמאות גורשו כ – 800,000 פלסטינים ממולדתם, עריהם וכפריהם נהרסו ולמעשה היישות הפלסטינית בפלסטין הושמדה כמעט כליל. וכיום, ממשיכה ישראל להרוס כל סממן של זהות, שלא לדבר על עצמאות פלסטינית הן בתוך ישראל והן בשטחים.

תשובה אחת לשאלה כיצד ניתן להביא לסיום הסכסוך שהיא אולי התשובה הקשה מכולן, מתבססת על כך שישראל היא למעשה מדינה שבה חיים שני העמים תחת שלטון אחד, כלומר ישראל היא מדינה דו-לאומית. מה שמתבקש זה לשנות את המסגרת הפוליטית הנוכחית המאפשרת רק לישראלים יהודים להיות אזרחים בעלי זכויות מלאות, ולהחליפה במסגרת מדינית שבה יורשו בני שני העמים להיות אזרחים שווי זכויות ויוכלו לבטא את זהותם הלאומית, הדתית והתרבותית.  במילים אחרות ישראל תהיה למדינה דמוקרטית שבה ישראלים ופלסטינים חיים בשויון זכויות מלא במולדתם ההיסטורית המשותפת, ארץ ישראל-פלסטין.

כאמור, אפשרות זו היא ללא ספק קשה ביותר. העם היהודי, לאחר 2000 שנות גלות ולאחר ששרד את השואה, קם לתחיה כמו הפיניקס האגדי וזכה להקים מדינה עצמאית.  מבחינה אנושית ומבחינה הסטורית תקומת ישראל היא בעלת חשיבות ללא תקדים.  כדי להבטיח את שלומו של עם ישראל בארץ ישראל דרושים גם חזון מדיני וגם נכונות להתפשר.  כדי להביא לסיום המצב הקשה בו נמצאת מדינת ישראל דרושה נכונות להכיר במציאות שנוצרה בין  1947 להיום: מדינת ישראל קמה על חשבון עם אחר, ואין מנוס מליצור מסגרת מדינית משותפת שבה יוכלו שני העמים לחיות בשלום.

25
Jul
09

Articles in Arabic

22
Apr
09

Moving Beyond The two State Solution

Moving Beyond Two States
By Miko Peled

United States envoy to the Middle East, George Mitchell, kicked off a visit to Israel restating the US commitment to the Road Map and the Two State Solution. However, both of these options have become irrelevant and it is time for the administration to seriously study the possibility of the two nations living together within a single democratic state. This is an option that moderate parties on both sides have discussed for decades, only to be silenced by more militant forces that see this as a zero sum game.

The one state option speaks of a single secular democracy between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea within which Israelis and Palestinians would live as equal citizens. This would elevate the rights of Palestinians to those of Israelis it will finally allow the two nations to stop bleeding and begin building. It is an ambitious proposition that Israel and its supporters will surely resist at first. However, judging by the facts on the ground, this may well be the only option available for the two nations.

In preparation for renewed US involvement in the Israeli Palestinian conflict, Israel’s newly elected Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu announced his opposition to establishing a Palestinian state. Israel’s newly appointed foreign minister went even further and announced that there will be no more peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Adopting a tactic clearly designed to give them room to negotiate, the two are positioning themselves as far to the right as possible in expectation of American demands for concessions to the Palestinians. Judging by the size and the political makeup of Israel’s new cabinet, it is safe to assume that no amount of American pressure will convince them to allow Palestinian independence or to halt settlement expansions in the West Bank.

When Jimmy Carter published his book “Palestine, Peace Not Apartheid” he insisted that the apartheid did not apply to Israel, only to the occupied territories. But now the West Bank is inseparable from Israel. Because of the large settlement blocks and highways that Israel built over the years, the West Bank can no longer be separated from the rest of the country. So regardless of what solution the US supports, the geography and the demographics no longer allow for the creation of a separate political entity in the West Bank, or anywhere else in historic Palestine/Israel.

Try as we may to pretend that Israel is a Western style democracy, it is simply not the case. The government of Israel controls the lives of five and a half million Jews who enjoy the freedoms of a democracy, 1.4 million Palestinians who live as second-class citizens within Israel but with severely limited civil rights and 3.5 million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza who are deprived of all civil and human rights.

Of the estimated ten million people living in historic Israel/Palestine today half are Israelis and half Palestinians. To bring a just and lasting end to the conflict the state must be divorced from religious or ethnic identity and provide all citizens equal rights. in other words, a secular, constitutional democracy that will protect the rights of all Palestinians and Israelis but will be the sole proprietorship of neither one. Equality, as history has shown us in this country, in South Africa and in other multi national, multi ethnic states, can only be guaranteed through laws that protect the rights of every citizen, regardless of race, religion or gender.

The Two State Solution and the Road Map are the latest in a series of failed attempts to solve the Israeli Palestinian conflict through partition and segregation. The best one can expect from pursuing these options is a dangerously volatile status quo. But the good news is that Israelis and Palestinians discuss the possibility of a single state openly at academic and political forums. Now that the President has announced that he will visit Israel this summer, it is time for the US to join this conversation.

23
Mar
09

Recognizing Israel By Miko Peled

The shooting of US citizen and peace activist Tristan Anderson by Israeli soldiers occurred just days after the 6th anniversary of the killing by Israeli forces of another American peace activist, Rachel Corey. In both cases the killing was unprovoked and intentional but no official condemnation of Israel has been made by the US. It is safe to assume that had Palestinians, Iranians or Syrians killed these Americans, the President would have made a statement by now condemning the shooting and possible scenarios for sanctions if not retaliation would have been contemplated.

What we do hear these days from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is that the US would not support a Palestinian government unless it recognizes the state of Israel and vows to end the violence. While the US promises millions of dollars to rebuild Gaza after the latest destruction inflicted by Israel, these dollars are contingent upon Palestinian recognition of Israel and a unilateral Palestinian commitment to end the violence. But who will guarantee to protect Palestinian civilians from Israeli attacks?

As Fatah and Hammas negotiate for Palestinian unity we are informed that they disagree on the issue of recognizing Israel. So let us explore what recognition of Israel means to Palestinians. Recognition means to forgive that in 1948 close to 500 Palestinian cities, towns and villages, were destroyed; to forgive that businesses and factories, mosques and schools were leveled and that Palestinians were forced into an exile that continues to this day. It means to forgive that in 1968, when Israel completed its conquest of Palestine it once again forced thousands of Palestinians into exile while taking over more land. It means to overlook the fact that for over 60 years Israel built towns and cities and farms for Jews only on Palestinian land and it continues to do so to this day in the West Bank.

Israel speaks of creating a Palestinian state but it enacts policies that make the establishment of such a state impossible. Palestinian sociologist Jamil Hilal puts it this way: “Israel’s policy has amounted to a systemic negation of the basic conditions necessary for a viable and sovereign Palestinian state.” Palestinians are pushed out of their homes and their land and into small, unlivable enclaves that can barely sustain themselves, much less be considered viable for statehood.

As we see in places like Na’alin, where Tristan Anderson was shot, Israeli response to Palestinian resistance is violent regardless of whether the resistance is violent or not. Israel holds an estimated ten thousand Palestinian political prisoners for belonging to the resistance, regardless of whether they actually participated in acts of violent resistance or not.

So it realistic to expect that Palestinian recognition of Israel will be forthcoming? Juxtaposing the reality in Gaza and the West Bank with US rhetoric one may conclude that the US wants the fate of Palestinian to be similar to that of Native Americans, i.e., complete surrender of their country and their rights. Palestinians are asked, or more accurately, it is demanded of Palestinians that they recognize the total domination of a country that has taken everything away from them and continues to attack them viciously and without discrimination. Again, one is forced to ask: Who is prepared to provide protection for the lives of innocent Palestinians? Sadly, on this issue one hears absolutely nothing from the US or Israel.

The first time srael took over Gaza was during the Eisenhower administration. In those days Israel was receiving very little money or weapons from the US, but when the American President gave the word, my father, Matti Peled, who was the Israeli military governor of Gaza had 2 weeks to get out. He did it in two days. Today, Israel receives an estimated ten million dollars per day from the US. One would expect that in return Israel would protect the lives of US citizens and respect the human and civil rights of Palestinian civilians.

23
Mar
09

The shooting of US citizen and peace activist Tristan Anderson by Israeli soldiers occurred just days after the 6th anniversary of the killing by Israeli forces of another American peace activist, Rachel Corey. In both cases the killing was unprovoked and intentional but no official condemnation of Israel has been made by the US. It is safe to assume that had Palestinians, Iranians or Syrians killed these Americans, the President would have made a statement by now condemning the shooting and possible scenarios for sanctions if not retaliation would have been contemplated.

What we do hear these days from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is that the US would not support a Palestinian government unless it recognizes the state of Israel and vows to end the violence. While the US promises millions of dollars to rebuild Gaza after the latest destruction inflicted by Israel, these dollars are contingent upon Palestinian recognition of Israel and a unilateral Palestinian commitment to end the violence. But who will guarantee to protect Palestinian civilians from Israeli attacks?

As Fatah and Hammas negotiate for Palestinian unity we are informed that they disagree on the issue of recognizing Israel. So let us explore what recognition of Israel means to Palestinians. Recognition means to forgive that in 1948 close to 500 Palestinian cities, towns and villages, were destroyed; to forgive that businesses and factories, mosques and schools were leveled and that Palestinians were forced into an exile that continues to this day. It means to forgive that in 1968, when Israel completed its conquest of Palestine it once again forced thousands of Palestinians into exile while taking over more land. It means to overlook the fact that for over 60 years Israel built towns and cities and farms for Jews only on Palestinian land and it continues to do so to this day in the West Bank.

Israel speaks of creating a Palestinian state but it enacts policies that make the establishment of such a state impossible. Palestinian sociologist Jamil Hilal puts it this way: “Israel’s policy has amounted to a systemic negation of the basic conditions necessary for a viable and sovereign Palestinian state.” Palestinians are pushed out of their homes and their land and into small, unlivable enclaves that can barely sustain themselves, much less be considered viable for statehood.

As we see in places like Na’alin, where Tristan Anderson was shot, Israeli response to Palestinian resistance is violent regardless of whether the resistance is violent or not. Israel holds an estimated ten thousand Palestinian political prisoners for belonging to the resistance, regardless of whether they actually participated in acts of violent resistance or not.

So it realistic to expect that Palestinian recognition of Israel will be forthcoming? Juxtaposing the reality in Gaza and the West Bank with US rhetoric one may conclude that the US wants the fate of Palestinian to be similar to that of Native Americans, i.e., complete surrender of their country and their rights. Palestinians are asked, or more accurately, it is demanded of Palestinians that they recognize the total domination of a country that has taken everything away from them and continues to attack them viciously and without discrimination. Again, one is forced to ask: Who is prepared to provide protection for the lives of innocent Palestinians? Sadly, on this issue one hears absolutely nothing from the US or Israel.

The first time Israel took over Gaza was during the Eisenhower administration. In those days Israel was receiving very little money or weapons from the US, but when the American President gave the word, my father, Matti Peled, who was the Israeli military governor of Gaza had 2 weeks to get out. He did it in two days. Today, Israel receives an estimated ten million dollars per day from the US. One would expect that in return Israel would protect the lives of US citizens and respect the human and civil rights of Palestinian civilians.

15
Feb
09

Winning in Gaza By Miko Peled

n715517329_1878308_8852-1The common wisdom regarding Israel’s latest attacks on Gaza suggests that Israel is defending itself against a vicious enemy and that all means justify the cause of security for the citizens of Israeli cities. Common wisdom dictates that the US must support the Israeli Jewish population in their effort to gain recognition and acceptance, not to say security for their fledgling democracy. But here common wisdom stand stands in stark contrast to the dictates of reality because Israel is fighting a war it cannot possibly win.

For more than sixty years Palestinians have been living as refugees in the Gaza strip as well as other areas in and around what used to be Palestine. Those who live in the refugee camps have for three generations suffered unimaginable hardships that began with homelessness, poverty and deprivation and went on to include incursions by Israeli commandos, shelling by Israeli artillery and air assaults by the Israeli air force. In Gaza close to 900,000 people are refugees who were forced off of their land in 1948. They and their descendants have suffered more than their fair share of hardships.

The accepted position on the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands is that it began in 1967, but for Palestinian refugees in Gaza and elsewhere the Israeli occupation of Palestine began in 1948 and was only completed in 1967. Many Israelis feel this way too. So to expect that a solution that deals only with lands occupied in 1967 will hold for any length of time is naïve at best, and the ashes of the peace process of the 1990’s lay as testament to that.

Most of the refugees in the Gaza Strip today came from the southern towns and villages of Palestine. According to UN sources, in 1948 some 200,000 refugees were concentrated in and around Gaza City whose original inhabitants numbered only 80,000. This severely burdened this narrow strip of land, an area of only 140 square miles. Today over three-quarters of 1.4 million people in the Gaza strip are registered refugees.
The Gaza strip includes the city of Gaza which is approximately 48 miles southwest of Jerusalem, with a population of 410,000, as well as the cities of Beit Hanoun , Beit Lahia, Deir el-Balah (at the end of 1170, Saladin’s army had arrived in Palestine entering through Darum, which is now known as Deir al-Balah) Jabalia, Khan Yunis and Rafah.
The majority of the refuges live in eight refugee camps that include: Jabalia, Rafah, Beach, Nuseirat, Khan Younis, Bureij, Maghazi and Deir el-Balah.
According to the United Nations the refugee camps in the Gaza Strip have one of the highest population densities in the world. For example, over 80,688 refugees live in Beach camp whose area is less than one square kilometer. This high population density is reflected in the overcrowded schools and classrooms. Even with poverty and over population, Gaza maintains one of the highest literacy rates in the world, 92%.

Today these refuges and their descendents, who live just a short drive from their original homes who now house Jewish Israelis, are being told by the world that they must accept their fate and live as refugees with no law to protect them, no human rights and no civil rights. They are also told quite clearly that any resistance on their part, violent or otherwise will not be tolerated. Israel, the country responsible for their present condition will never allow them to return to their homes, to resist or to become part of a larger Israel/Palestine.

Whether one agrees that Palestinians deserve the same rights as all other people or not, one has to recognize why resistance to Israel has developed in the refugee camps in Gaza. It is a vicious cycle, not unknown in the history of other nations. Since the early 1950’s refugees from Gaza tried to enter the newly establish Israel, seeking to reclaim houses, possessions, or crops. Eventually guerrilla fighters began to enter Israel and to engage in violent acts against Israeli citizens. It wasn’t long before Israel developed a policy of no tolerance whereby infiltrators were shot on sight and retaliatory strikes in response to guerrilla attacks ensued.

In 1953 Ariel Sharon, then a young officer was sent at the head of the famous Unit 101 into Gaza to cleanse it of terrorists and to stop Palestinian “infiltrators” from penetrating Israeli borders. Sharon stated: “If we don’t act against the refugee camps, they would become a murderers’ nest.” Or in other words, centers for resistance against Israel. Israeli attacks on Gaza continued throughout the 1950’s, 60’s 70’s and they continue to this very day. It is hard not to see that this is an ongoing campaign against a nation that is unwilling to give up the struggle for freedom and justice.

Gaza has a history of being tough to subdue. It is said the Alexander The Great had to fight a bitter battle to conquer it, as did the British during the First World War. While violence may quell the resistance for a short time, all it takes is one child who decides to take up the fight and as we know this is a battle that no conquering power has ever one.

Miko Peled is an Israeli writer and peace activist living in San Diego. His father was the later Israeli General, Matti Peled who was also the first Israeli military Governor of Gaza. For comments or contact information please go to mikopeled.wordpress.com

18
Jan
09

A Movie Speaks a Thousand Words. On the movie “To See If I’m Smiling”. By Miko Peled

The topic about which I wish to write is so disturbing that after scribbling a few facts and figures I found myself glaring at the screen unable to express my thoughts or feelings in any meaningful way. This has gone on for some time until on Christmas day I decided to do something. I shunned my ever-refilling email mailbox as well as my friends on facebook and decided to take action. But once again I found myself staring at the screen unable to write. Where does one seek inspiration to write? I thought of all the wonderful things I have read by others and then it hit me: Edward Said.

If one wants to write about almost anything, but certainly about Palestine and Israel in any meaningful way Edward Said is sure to inspire thoughts and shake the mind so that words may flow out of it. As I began a random search of his name an abundance of information came up. The following quote was the first thing I saw: “Remember the solidarity shown to Palestine here and everywhere… and remember also that there is a cause to which many people have committed themselves, difficulties and terrible obstacles notwithstanding. Why? Because it is a just cause, a noble ideal, a moral quest for equality and human rights.” At last I found a video of a lecture given by Edward Said on May 8, 2003 at the University of Washington, a video I subsequently posted on my facebook for the benefit of others. I did this knowing full well that most people will not have the luxury I did on Christmas day to view the complete 99 minutes of the lecture, and so I posted a comment to say: “even if you only listen to 5 minutes of this, it will be worth it.”

But back to the topic of this article: I have recently returned from spending three weeks in the Middle East. The purpose of the trip was to enter Gaza through Egypt and to deliver a few basic medical tools to Ahli hospital in Gaza. Needless to say, this part of the trip was a total failure. The Egyptians, just as the Israelis command, have locked the gates of Rafah and anyone curious enough to learn the details of my trip is welcome to  select the “Gaza trip” in this site. But a trip to the Middle East is never about just one thing. It is not humanly possible to avoid visiting friends in the West Bank and in East Jerusalem. Nor is it possible to avoid running into old friends, Israelis who live in their bubble and care nothing about the actions of their democratically elected government. These friends will usually categorize me and my views on the Palestinian Israeli issue, as Edward Said puts it, as: “Reductive and simply wrong.”

Frankly had Israel been a totalitarian regime like, say Nazi Germany for example, one could understand the lack of popular resistance to the atrocities committed by the government and its army, police, border patrol and secret intelligence services. Had this been some middle eastern dictatorship, where one “only opens his mouth on the dentist’s chair” as one friend of mine puts it, fearing kidnapping and torture for speaking against the regime, one might be inclined to forgive Israelis for allowing their elected government to treat Palestinians with such brutal force. But as we are so often reminded Israel is a democracy. Its government represents the will of the people. These people, the citizens of Israel, like to be thought of as peace loving people but they vote for people like Ariel Sharon and Ehud Barak, Bibi Netanyahu and Tzipi Livni. They serve in the occupation army willingly, they are glad to go, as the son of one of my good friend’s said to me with pride, he is going to volunteer to serve in the “Sayarot” or the illustrious Special Forces.  These same “Special forces” by the way, received a severe blow by Hezbollah in the last Lebanon War.

Before leaving Israel I was given a copy of a movie that I decided to watch on the plane. It had a curious name, as many Israeli movies seem to have, particularly when they are translated into English. The name of this movie is “To See If I’m Smiling.” In the name of the sacred equality it is demanded of us to constantly mention the Israeli victims of the conflict. We are reminded that we must never forget the suffering of the Jews who came to their homeland after 2000 years to finally find a refuge from persecution of the other nations. Well, this is a story about the suffering of the Israelis, five young Israeli girls to be exact. Five young, innocent and idealistic girls who willingly entered an occupation army of brutally violent criminals; the girls were ordered to facilitate the beating, torture and virtual rape of Palestinians living under occupation, and eventually they realized that they were being beaten and raped themselves. They were permitted only to leave from time to time to take a breath of fresh air and then they had to return. Many of the girls felt that something was wrong, and wanted to speak up, but as they looked around them they saw that what was going on was looked upon as normal and so they stayed and said nothing. Then, after two years the girls were allowed to leave, to return home as though nothing had ever happened.

Israel is the only country in the world that has law binding, compulsory army service for women. In “To See I’m Smiling” five girls speak out about the most acts they had performed while they were in the service of Israel’s occupation army. But during their service they were also complicit in their own mental and emotional rape and abuse by the system they served. The intensity of their experience and their emotions don’t allow them to forget and in this movie they speak out about what they had done and how they ended up doing it.

Meytal is an officer in the medical corps. By training she is a medic and she chose to become an officer. “I was ecstatic when I heard that I was assigned to Hebron” she says, because as she admits, she heard that Hebron was where the real action was taking place. Real fighting, real casualties and everything that comes with being a soldier. She recalls that soon after she arrived there was an “operation” and she says: “I felt the danger, real danger. There was gunfire everywhere.” The brutal force Israel uses against Palestinians especially in Hebron assists in the myth that Israel is actually fighting a war, rather than merely applying brutal force against a population that has no means of defense. “Our guys returned with a body” of a young Palestinian that was killed by the Israeli forces. She never expected that she would be given the duty of “cleaning up” the body. “We had to clean him before returning him to the Palestinian Authorities” she says “so that there will be no blood stains and so that they will not know what we did to him.” “This particular man suffered a head injury and he did not die immediately,” Meytal continues deliberately, “he died a slow death, and he lost control of his sphincters. That’s what happens” she calmly explains, “He had basically defecated and urinated all over himself”. “People look at me now and ask me: you did what? You cleaned a corps? But I cannot afford to be disgusted by this. “Why” the narrator asks and Meytal replies, “Because it is on my hands, the blood is on my hands. I cannot be disgusted by my hands, I have to be able to use my hands.” Meytal also recalls a time when she was hosing down a body and he happened to have an erection, an embarrassing yet not an irregular occurrence. “Another girl walked by and she happened to have a camera. I asked her if she would take a picture of me with the body.” At the end of the movie she looks at the photos and says “I want to see if I was smiling.” She says and as she looks at the pictures with obvious horror she asks, “how could I have thought I would ever forget this.”

Rotem is in charge of an observation post – “it is an amazing sense of control, you have a lot of power, telling the commanders where to send the troops.” Once she spots the offenders, children getting ready to throw rocks or erect a roadblock, she calls in the troops. But as she goes through a debriefing she has doubts and she asks the officer debriefing her: “If the boys do not admit they will be released, won’t they?” “Hem yodu” the officer says in Hebrew – “they will confess!” This statement runs shivers down her spine. “What does he mean they will confess, under what circumstances?” at one point a child was shot and killed; “at that point I stopped feeling” she says and she realizes she was the one guiding the forces to that child. Now at the young age of 21, she has to live with the fact that she is responsible for the killing of an innocent child. In a scene right out of Macbeth she recalls, “When I was on leave I called a friend and said to her that it wont come off.” “What won’t come off?” her friend asked. “Don’t you get it?” She replies “I keep trying with soap and it wont come off. The blood on my hands, it wont come off. My friend thought I was joking, she didn’t realize this was no joke”

Inbar is an Operations sergeant for a unit that patrols the walls and towers surrounding Gaza. “The unbearable lightness of death” is how she describes the state of things. It used to be that if someone approached the fence the Israeli soldiers would fire warning shots in the air. Then one day they started shooting to kill. “I remember that first time when a man ran up the fence yelling “Allahu Akbar”, and they shot him. His body remained there stuck on the fence.” It is like the Wild West, she says, we do whatever we want. I was overwhelmed by the control. You can summon someone with your finger and without hesitation they obey!

At one point the Commanding Officer was patrolling and he saw a boy standing around with the soldiers. “Why is this child still here?” he asked, “He was released hours ago.” “We were just playing with him” the troops reply causally. The child was crying hysterically, having been beaten and abused. “I want a report ASAP “ the Commander says and some time later Inbar brought the report to him. In the report, she says, the soldiers did not even lie, – they told of the cigarette burns, beatings and other forms of abuse the boy suffered in their hands. Inbar presented the report to the CO; he read it and then he said he wanted a different report. “With this report, internal investigations will be all over us. Go ask the unit commander to issue a different report.” This was asked of her without hesitation, without a doubt that she would indeed obey this horrendous illegal order.

Inbar says that she was “considering calling the press – I hesitated and then I just didn’t, because, well, because.” The new report was issued and it said that the child is a pathological liar and that was the end of it.

Dana, NCO Officer in charge of education. “You become a-sexual in order to belong. You learn to talk like a guy, you have to loose your femininity.” As I was walking around, familiarizing myself with the troops I came a cross one group who all had Masbaha (prayer beads) and copies of the Koran. “Where did you get these?” she asked and they replied “we got them from Kalkilia” – in other words they stole them. “I was shocked, looting is illegal. At a meeting with the regiment commander I told him the story.” She recalls “are you sure about this?” he asked. She confirmed what she said and he called the company commander. Later when the company commander and the soldiers saw her they spat when she walked by. “One day” she recalls that there was a lot of commotion. “I stopped washing the dishes, which is what I did most of the time, and I stepped out. Everyone was excited, the guys had just returned from an “operation” and there was a body in the vehicle. They took it out and the guys began to take pictures of themselves with the body. Something deep inside told me that this was wrong, that there is something wrong about posing with dead bodies.”

Tal recalls patrolling in a Palestinian town when all of a sudden they heard the song “I got the power” blaring from the mosque. “They took over the mosque and played music! What A terrific joke! They guys loved it.” We loved the adrenaline. “We got to go to the shooting range which is a lot of fun. I became really good at filling coke cans with bullet holes. I even had one on my desk with a sign that said: Anyone who annoys me will end up like this coke can.” My first “operation” involved a protest that erupted in the aftermath of the army blowing up someone’s house. “People were running in all directions like crazy. The crowds are running amok! I noticed a child that was crying and screaming and I wanted to pick him up. It is a basic instinct to want to comfort a crying child, it is a basic motherly instinct. Suddenly his mother came and I saw the look on her face. That look said everything to me about what I had become.

Libi is a combat soldier. We were there to impose order. Angered by the death of another soldier girl she decided she would take her revenge on every person who crossed her checkpoint during her 14 hour shift. “I lined up more than 80 people and I had them stand in order, do pushups, and I treated them as though they were my recruits, humiliating them throughout the whole shift. None of the other soldiers thought I was doing anything wrong. It was nothing out of the ordinary.”

When the abnormal become normal and the worst of mankind become “nothing out of the ordinary” we know things have gone badly wrong. Israeli cabinet ministers, Generals and field officers need to be brought to justice form their crimes. And sooner would be better than later.